Tuesday, 27 August 2013

How Moyes tactically outclassed Mourinho and why United dominated Chelsea





Manchester United vs Chelsea promised a lot of fireworks with the numerous sub plots brewing between the two teams. Moyes started Rooney, much to everyone’s surprise, while Mourinho started without a recognised striker. What was billed as the match of the season, however, ended in a stalemate. While the match was termed as a dull draw by many, it provided a lot of talking points to the tactically keen. Let us have a look at the most important of them all – the battle of midfield which was won by Manchester United.

 



The midfield battle – 


The following table clearly indicates who triumphed in the middle of the park. The table is a comparison between the two midfield pairs, Carrick + Cleverley and Ramires + Lampard – 


Carrick + Cleverley
Ramires + Lampard
Total passes
143
99
Passes completed
127
81
% pass completion
89%
82%
Interceptions
9
0
Tackles
6
4
Key passes
3
0

Higher number of passes attempted, higher % pass completion, 9 interceptions compared to none from the Chelsea midfield and 3 key passes – clearly, shows that Carrick and Cleverley were miles ahead of their opponents on Monday.


What made the difference - 


In the past few meetings between the two sides, Chelsea have always held the upper hand more often than not. However, that was not the case yesterday as Manchester United dominated throughout and created good goal scoring chances, but failing to convert any. The dominance shown by United yesterday can be attributed to mainly two facts – 

1)      Positional exchange between Carrick and Cleverley, i.e., Carrick played as left central midfielder and Cleverley as the right central midfielder. Generally, it is always the other way round, but this tactical master class by Moyes proved to be very decisive. 

2)      Excellent positional sense of Carrick. While this is undoubtedly Carrick’s main strength, he sometimes goes amiss when he comes up against a strong, fast midfield. However, that wasn’t the case yesterday as he looked the best player on the pitch for Manchester United along with Wayne Rooney.



Positional exchange between Carrick and Cleverley – 

While this may seem as a minor change in formation, it made a world of difference to the Manchester United side. Previously, when Cleverley played as left central midfielder, right in front of Ramires, he had to track Ramires back often and with Carrick already sitting deep, it gave Lampard and Mata (who often dropped back into central midfield) lots of space to exploit in the centre. Ramires has been very effective against United mainly because of Cleverley’s ineffectiveness to either control him or advance forward into attacking positions. 

However, with Cleverley playing as right central midfield yesterday, directly in front of Frank Lampard, he did not have to worry about Ramires’ forward runs. He played higher up the pitch as Lampard himself likes to operate from a deeper position now. And Carrick, who played as left central midfielder, sat deep and his positional brilliance took care of Ramires’ forward runs, if any. With Lampard being crowded out of the game by Cleverley, Ramires had to drop deeper to collect the ball, which allowed Carrick to push up, thereby squeezing Chelsea into their own half. 


I would like to illustrate this by using action areas of Ramires, Cleverley and Lampard, both in yesterday’s match and the match played last season at Old Trafford on 5th May, in which Chelsea won 1-0.

Below are the action areas of Ramires. The first is the match played on Monday, while the next is the match played on 5th May'13 last season.

Ramires Action Areas vs ManUtd - 26 Aug, 2013


Ramires Action Areas vs ManUtd - 05 May, 2013
 
It can be clearly seen that in the match last season, he was more dominant in the attacking half, while in this season’s match, he was forced to play a much deeper role.

 Below are the action areas of Frank Lampard. The first is the match played on Monday, while the second is the match played on 5th May'13, last season

Frank Lampard Action Areas vs ManUtd - 26 August, 2013



Frank Lampard Action Areas vs ManUtd - 05 May, 2013
Again, similar to Ramires, it can be seen that he pushed forward into United’s half more often in the game last season. However, that didn’t happen yesterday.

Below are Cleverley’s action areas from 3 matches – first one being the match that United won 3-2 at Stamford Bridge on 28th October, the second one is that of the match played on 5th May last season, which Chelsea won 1-0 and the third one being that of the match played on Monday.
 


Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 28 October, 2013

Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 05 My, 2013
Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 26 August, 2013

Comparing the 3, it is evident that his positioning in central midfield was the most in the last match, along with a considerable presence on the right wing too (When Valencia tucked into midfield and took central positions). On the other hand, in the previous two matches, he was pushed back into his own half and on the occasional foray that he made into attack, Ramires made sure that he exploited the space left open by Cleverley.



Carrick’s excellent positional sense – 


Carrick excelled in the left central midfield role. With Welbeck coming infield to offer support and Ramires also being pushed back to help Lampard, Carrick had time, space and options to pick a pass.
A comparison between Carrick’s passing graph from the game yesterday and Cleverley’s passing graph from the match played last season on 5th May illustrates the point perfectly. Note that both played as left central midfielder in the respective matches.


Michael Carrick Pass Distribution vs Chelsea - 26 August, 2013

Tom Cleverley Pass Distribution vs Chelsea - 05 May, 2013
Cleverley’s skewed passing distribution clearly shows he was all over the place and had almost zero involvement in the final third. Carrick, on the other hand, made several forward passes as well as long range passes. Also, he was fully aware of his position on the pitch and made sure that he did not leave space in the defensive third of the pitch for the likes De Bruyne and Schurrle to exploit.




Conclusion – 


Well, its clear now that Moyes got it tactically correct in the middle of the park. While some might argue whether he should have started Kagawa instead of Welbeck or Valencia, but he certainly made the right selection and positioning of his central midfield pair.

On a parting note, here is another stat which shows the United midfield’s increasing influence on their team’s performance.


Comparison - ManUtd midfield contribution vs Chelsea midfield contribution in both matches


An impressive 26% of the team’s passes were just between the two United midfielders, which shows almost everything went through them on Monday.


It will be interesting to see whether Moyes sticks to this or if he alters his midfield as per the opposition, which should ideally be the case. Also with the talk of United buying a central midfielder before the transfer window closes, much surprise and excitement awaits Manchester United fans.















































5 comments:

  1. Moyes got it tactically correct; but I think Mourinho was being over-smart at the start. He had superior overall attacking resources, but his 4-6-0 allowed the United centre-backs too much room to play the ball. Most of Chelsea's shots came from outside the box. Defensively I thought they did a good job on RvP, who was invisible right through.

    It's fair to say that Moyes being the superior tactician on the night wasn't really saying much for the overall level of tactical thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes of course, Mourinho got it wrong in the start itself. Infact, the success of the United midfield on that day was also due to De Bruyne and Schurrle's ineffective pressing and man marking. Maybe if Mourinho had actually played a proper centre forward up front, it might have been different.

    However, just a slight tactical tweak of exchanging Carrick and Cleverley's position was the key here. And that is largely what I've emphasized in the article. Because we have seen the United midfield getting over-run in the previous encounters between the two teams. I've just tried to reason out why.

    Difficult to comment on the overall level of tactical thinking of the two managers as this was just one match.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Analysis is good but its like proving a statement that carric and cleverley are better. The intentions of chelsea is different in both august and may games. As in may chelsea need a win for sure but here mou just want to make sure he wont loose and any win a bonus. mou deployed 6 midfielders to make sure no gaps in midfield and expecting a goal on counter atk which didnt happen. mou is the one who highly depends on strikers efficiency which oscar failed to convert his chances by shooting straight to keeper in both the occasions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Badri,agreed that the situations were entirely different. But the fact that inspite of playing 6 midfielders, United dominated the game. Also, you must be aware of how Chelsea have dominated United in the last few matches between the teams. Why do you think that the same midfield duo of Ramires-Lampard failed on Monday?
      Because of a simple move to exchange Carrick and Cleverley's position in midfield.
      And I have just tried to explain that, which is why it seems as though I have glorified the two players. However, it was actually a taactical switch by Moyes at the start of the match and not something that the players came up with themselves over the course of the match. And hence I have given the credit for the same to Moyes, because he really did outclass Mourinho tactically on the night.
      Having watched United's matches over the years, I am a 100% sure that if Moyes had not made that interchange, Ramires would have dominated United again and the result of the match could have been entirely different.

      Anyways, I appreciate you pointing out that Chelsea are in a complete different situation as compared to previous season. Lets analyse what happens in the next meeting between these two sides ;)

      Thanks

      Delete
    2. Badri, may I know how you were directed to our blog?

      Would really appreciate your response.

      Thanks,

      TFOB

      Delete