Manchester United vs Chelsea promised a lot of fireworks
with the numerous sub plots brewing between the two teams. Moyes started Rooney,
much to everyone’s surprise, while Mourinho started without a recognised
striker. What was billed as the match of the season, however, ended in a
stalemate. While the match was termed as a dull draw by many, it provided a lot
of talking points to the tactically keen. Let us have a look at the most
important of them all – the battle of midfield which was won by Manchester
United.
The midfield battle –
The following table clearly indicates who triumphed in the
middle of the park. The table is a comparison between the two midfield pairs,
Carrick + Cleverley and Ramires + Lampard –
|
|
Carrick + Cleverley
|
Ramires + Lampard
|
|
Total passes
|
143
|
99
|
|
Passes completed
|
127
|
81
|
|
% pass completion
|
89%
|
82%
|
|
Interceptions
|
9
|
0
|
|
Tackles
|
6
|
4
|
|
Key passes
|
3
|
0
|
Higher number of passes attempted, higher % pass completion,
9 interceptions compared to none from the Chelsea midfield and 3 key passes –
clearly, shows that Carrick and Cleverley were miles ahead of their opponents
on Monday.
What made the difference -
In the past few meetings between the two sides, Chelsea have
always held the upper hand more often than not. However, that was not the case
yesterday as Manchester United dominated throughout and created good goal
scoring chances, but failing to convert any. The dominance shown by United
yesterday can be attributed to mainly two facts –
1)
Positional exchange between Carrick and
Cleverley, i.e., Carrick played as left central midfielder and Cleverley as the
right central midfielder. Generally, it is always the other way round, but this
tactical master class by Moyes proved to be very decisive.
2)
Excellent positional sense of Carrick. While
this is undoubtedly Carrick’s main strength, he sometimes goes amiss when he
comes up against a strong, fast midfield. However, that wasn’t the case
yesterday as he looked the best player on the pitch for Manchester United along
with Wayne Rooney.
Positional exchange between Carrick and Cleverley –
While this may seem as a minor change in formation, it made
a world of difference to the Manchester United side. Previously, when Cleverley
played as left central midfielder, right in front of Ramires, he had to track
Ramires back often and with Carrick already sitting deep, it gave Lampard and
Mata (who often dropped back into central midfield) lots of space to exploit in
the centre. Ramires has been very effective against United mainly because of
Cleverley’s ineffectiveness to either control him or advance forward into
attacking positions.
However, with Cleverley playing as right central midfield
yesterday, directly in front of Frank Lampard, he did not have to worry about
Ramires’ forward runs. He played higher up the pitch as Lampard himself likes
to operate from a deeper position now. And Carrick, who played as left central
midfielder, sat deep and his positional brilliance took care of Ramires’
forward runs, if any. With Lampard being crowded out of the game by Cleverley,
Ramires had to drop deeper to collect the ball, which allowed Carrick to push
up, thereby squeezing Chelsea into their own half.
I would like to illustrate this by using action areas of
Ramires, Cleverley and Lampard, both in yesterday’s match and the match played
last season at Old Trafford on 5th May, in which Chelsea won 1-0.
Below are the action areas of Ramires. The first is the match played
on Monday, while the next is the match played on 5th May'13 last
season.
![]() |
| Ramires Action Areas vs ManUtd - 26 Aug, 2013 |
![]() |
| Ramires Action Areas vs ManUtd - 05 May, 2013 |
It can
be clearly seen that in the match last season, he was more dominant in the
attacking half, while in this season’s match, he was forced to play a much
deeper role.
Below are the action areas of Frank Lampard. The first is the match
played on Monday, while the second is the match played on 5th May'13,
last season
![]() | |||
| Frank Lampard Action Areas vs ManUtd - 26 August, 2013 |
![]() |
| Frank Lampard Action Areas vs ManUtd - 05 May, 2013 |
Again,
similar to Ramires, it can be seen that he pushed forward into United’s half
more often in the game last season. However, that didn’t happen yesterday.
Below are Cleverley’s action areas from 3 matches – first one being the match that United won 3-2 at Stamford Bridge on 28th October, the second one is that of the match played on 5th May last season, which Chelsea won 1-0 and the third one being that of the match played on Monday.
![]() |
| Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 28 October, 2013 |
![]() |
| Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 05 My, 2013 |
![]() |
| Tom Cleverley Action Areas vs Chelsea - 26 August, 2013 |
Comparing the 3, it is
evident that his positioning in central midfield was the most in the last
match, along with a considerable presence on the right wing too (When Valencia
tucked into midfield and took central positions). On the other hand, in the
previous two matches, he was pushed back into his own half and on the occasional
foray that he made into attack, Ramires made sure that he exploited the space
left open by Cleverley.
Carrick’s excellent positional sense –
Carrick excelled in the
left central midfield role. With Welbeck coming infield to offer support and
Ramires also being pushed back to help Lampard, Carrick had time, space and
options to pick a pass.
A comparison between
Carrick’s passing graph from the game yesterday and Cleverley’s passing graph
from the match played last season on 5th May illustrates the point
perfectly. Note that both played as left central midfielder in the respective
matches.
![]() |
| Michael Carrick Pass Distribution vs Chelsea - 26 August, 2013 |
![]() |
| Tom Cleverley Pass Distribution vs Chelsea - 05 May, 2013 |
Cleverley’s skewed passing
distribution clearly shows he was all over the place and had almost zero
involvement in the final third. Carrick, on the other hand, made several
forward passes as well as long range passes. Also, he was fully aware of his
position on the pitch and made sure that he did not leave space in the
defensive third of the pitch for the likes De Bruyne and Schurrle to exploit.
Conclusion –
Well, its clear now that
Moyes got it tactically correct in the middle of the park. While some might
argue whether he should have started Kagawa instead of Welbeck or Valencia, but
he certainly made the right selection and positioning of his central midfield
pair.
On a parting note, here is
another stat which shows the United midfield’s increasing influence on their
team’s performance.
![]() |
| Comparison - ManUtd midfield contribution vs Chelsea midfield contribution in both matches |
An impressive 26% of the
team’s passes were just between the two United midfielders, which shows almost
everything went through them on Monday.
It will be interesting to
see whether Moyes sticks to this or if he alters his midfield as per the
opposition, which should ideally be the case. Also with the talk of United
buying a central midfielder before the transfer window closes, much surprise
and excitement awaits Manchester United fans.










Moyes got it tactically correct; but I think Mourinho was being over-smart at the start. He had superior overall attacking resources, but his 4-6-0 allowed the United centre-backs too much room to play the ball. Most of Chelsea's shots came from outside the box. Defensively I thought they did a good job on RvP, who was invisible right through.
ReplyDeleteIt's fair to say that Moyes being the superior tactician on the night wasn't really saying much for the overall level of tactical thinking.
Yes of course, Mourinho got it wrong in the start itself. Infact, the success of the United midfield on that day was also due to De Bruyne and Schurrle's ineffective pressing and man marking. Maybe if Mourinho had actually played a proper centre forward up front, it might have been different.
ReplyDeleteHowever, just a slight tactical tweak of exchanging Carrick and Cleverley's position was the key here. And that is largely what I've emphasized in the article. Because we have seen the United midfield getting over-run in the previous encounters between the two teams. I've just tried to reason out why.
Difficult to comment on the overall level of tactical thinking of the two managers as this was just one match.
Analysis is good but its like proving a statement that carric and cleverley are better. The intentions of chelsea is different in both august and may games. As in may chelsea need a win for sure but here mou just want to make sure he wont loose and any win a bonus. mou deployed 6 midfielders to make sure no gaps in midfield and expecting a goal on counter atk which didnt happen. mou is the one who highly depends on strikers efficiency which oscar failed to convert his chances by shooting straight to keeper in both the occasions.
ReplyDeleteYes Badri,agreed that the situations were entirely different. But the fact that inspite of playing 6 midfielders, United dominated the game. Also, you must be aware of how Chelsea have dominated United in the last few matches between the teams. Why do you think that the same midfield duo of Ramires-Lampard failed on Monday?
DeleteBecause of a simple move to exchange Carrick and Cleverley's position in midfield.
And I have just tried to explain that, which is why it seems as though I have glorified the two players. However, it was actually a taactical switch by Moyes at the start of the match and not something that the players came up with themselves over the course of the match. And hence I have given the credit for the same to Moyes, because he really did outclass Mourinho tactically on the night.
Having watched United's matches over the years, I am a 100% sure that if Moyes had not made that interchange, Ramires would have dominated United again and the result of the match could have been entirely different.
Anyways, I appreciate you pointing out that Chelsea are in a complete different situation as compared to previous season. Lets analyse what happens in the next meeting between these two sides ;)
Thanks
Badri, may I know how you were directed to our blog?
DeleteWould really appreciate your response.
Thanks,
TFOB